Saturday August 15th 2026

Booth LLP Wins Nonsuit in a Wrongful Termination-Discrimination Case

Booth LLP Wins Defense Verdict in Discrimination-Retaliation Case

Booth LLP Defends Dismissal of Clean Water Act Claim In Appeal To The Ninth Circuit

Congratulations to Hillary Arrow Booth and Allan Bareng on Their Trial Success!

Hillary Booth Presents a Panel Discussion on Techniques to Reduce the Chances of a Nuclear Verdict

Hillary Booth Speaks on Contract Drafting for Transportation Companies

Booth LLP Obtains Dismissal of Intellectual Property Claims

Booth LLP Defeats Fire Claims of 472 Plaintiffs at Trial

Booth LLP Solidifies Meal and Rest Break Preemption for Interstate Drivers

Welcome to Azniv Khararjian

Welcome to Madison Romine

Trial Victory For Booth LLP's Client

Booth LLP Wins Bus Accident Case at Trial

Booth LLP Upholds Defense Verdict on Appeal

Loosened Restrictions on "No Re-Hire" Provisions in Employment Settlement Agreements

Booth LLP Obtains Dismissal Of All Claims In A Mold-Based Fraud And Contract Suit

California Expands Employers' Notice and Reporting Obligations

Federal and State Court Rulings Conflict on Misclassification Standards

California Enacts New Law Providing Additional Workers' Compensation Rights

California Court Of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgement Obtained By Booth LLP

Hillary Booth Speaks On Covid-19 Issues For Law Firms

Office Update Re Covid-19

Holiday Cheers!

Booth LLP Wins A Defense Verdict

Hillary Booth Completes Her Year As President Of The Transportation Lawyers Association

Our Office Move Is Complete!

Booth LLP Holiday Celebration

International Women's Day

Paul D. Rasmussen Joins Booth LLP

Booth LLP Obtains Dismissal Of All Claims In A Mold-Based Fraud And Contract Suit

December 16, 2020

Booth LLP successfully defeated multiple fraud and contract-based claims brought against its client on behalf of a family of 6 plaintiffs, all claiming injury based on alleged mold contamination in a rented home.  Booth LLP attorneys Jason Booth and Scott Greene represented a subcontractor in the remediation efforts, who was sued along with the property owners and other remediation contractors.  Booth LLP successfully challenged the claims made in the initial Complaint, including Consumer Fraud, and convinced the Court to strike the accompanying demand for attorney’s fees.  Plaintiff was given a chance to restate and augment their claims, and Booth LLP challenged that Amended Complaint.  Despite the efforts by Plaintiffs’ attorneys, BOOTH LLP established that Plaintiffs could not allege any specific, allegedly fraudulent statements made by its client to any of the Plaintiffs, nor did it owe any duty to the Plaintiffs based on contract.  Plaintiffs claimed both 3rd Party Beneficiary status and a “special relationship,” but Booth LLP was able to convince the Court to grant its second challenge without leave to amend as to all claims, effectively ending the case as to Booth LLP’s client.  

© 2024 BOOTH LLP, All Rights Reserved
DesignCSC
Website/Photography: Carsten Steinhausen/