Tuesday May 19th 2026

Booth LLP Wins Nonsuit in a Wrongful Termination-Discrimination Case

Booth LLP Wins Defense Verdict in Discrimination-Retaliation Case

Booth LLP Defends Dismissal of Clean Water Act Claim In Appeal To The Ninth Circuit

Congratulations to Hillary Arrow Booth and Allan Bareng on Their Trial Success!

Hillary Booth Presents a Panel Discussion on Techniques to Reduce the Chances of a Nuclear Verdict

Hillary Booth Speaks on Contract Drafting for Transportation Companies

Booth LLP Obtains Dismissal of Intellectual Property Claims

Booth LLP Defeats Fire Claims of 472 Plaintiffs at Trial

Booth LLP Solidifies Meal and Rest Break Preemption for Interstate Drivers

Welcome to Azniv Khararjian

Welcome to Madison Romine

Trial Victory For Booth LLP's Client

Booth LLP Wins Bus Accident Case at Trial

Booth LLP Upholds Defense Verdict on Appeal

Loosened Restrictions on "No Re-Hire" Provisions in Employment Settlement Agreements

Booth LLP Obtains Dismissal Of All Claims In A Mold-Based Fraud And Contract Suit

California Expands Employers' Notice and Reporting Obligations

Federal and State Court Rulings Conflict on Misclassification Standards

California Enacts New Law Providing Additional Workers' Compensation Rights

California Court Of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgement Obtained By Booth LLP

Hillary Booth Speaks On Covid-19 Issues For Law Firms

Office Update Re Covid-19

Holiday Cheers!

Booth LLP Wins A Defense Verdict

Hillary Booth Completes Her Year As President Of The Transportation Lawyers Association

Our Office Move Is Complete!

Booth LLP Holiday Celebration

International Women's Day

Paul D. Rasmussen Joins Booth LLP

Loosened Restrictions on "No Re-Hire" Provisions in Employment Settlement Agreements

January 15, 2021

California Code of Civil Procedure section 1002.5, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2020, prohibits "no-rehire" provisions in settlement agreements.  These "no-rehire" provisions prevent, prohibit or otherwise restrict employees from obtaining future employment with the employer or a related entity. These provisions are prohibited from settlement agreements when an employee has filed a claim against an employer in either court or an administrative agency, or made a complaint through some form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or employer internal complaint process. This prohibition against "no-rehire" provisions does not apply to severance agreements. There is also an exception to this prohibition when an employer has made a "good faith determination" that the former employee engaged in sexual harassment or sexual assault.

However, AB 2143 was recently enacted which slightly modifies California Code of Civil Procedure section 1002.5. Specifically, it requires that the aggrieved former employee must have filed the claim in good faith in order for the prohibition against "no-rehire" provisions to apply.

It also expands this "no-rehire" exception to allow no-rehire provisions when the former employee engaged in any criminal conduct, rather than limiting the exception to sexual harassment or sexual assault.

Finally, AB 2143 clarifies that, in order to qualify for the "good faith determination" exception, an employer's determination must have been made and documented before the aggrieved person filed the claim or complaint. 

For further information or consultation, contact Allan P. Bareng at ABareng@BoothLLP.com.

The full text of AB  2143 can be found here: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2143

© 2024 BOOTH LLP, All Rights Reserved
DesignCSC
Website/Photography: Carsten Steinhausen/